The California Consumer Privacy Act comes into force on January 1, 2020, and will impact many companies that collect or process personal data of California residents, expanding compliance...
On May 20, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a significant decision in Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, holding that the rejection of a trademark license in bankruptcy...
The latest issue of our quarterly report on developments in IP, data privacy and cybersecurity law includes summaries and analysis on matters including:
The Supreme Court’s grant of ...
Davis Polk is pleased to provide you with the next installment of its Intellectual Property and Tech Transactions Update, a quarterly newsletter that features summaries and analysis of re...
On April 24, the United States Supreme Court issued two opinions about the United States Patent and Trademark Office’s (“USPTO”) inter partes review procedure. First, it upheld the ...
On March 27, the Federal Circuit reversed the district court’s finding that Google’s use of Java APIs in its Android operating system was fair use, resurrecting Oracle’s multibillio...
Davis Polk is pleased to provide you with the next installment of its Intellectual Property and Tech Transactions Update, a quarterly newsletter that features summaries and analysis of re...
Davis Polk is pleased to announce the launch of its Intellectual Property and Tech Transactions Update, a quarterly newsletter that will feature summaries and analysis of recent developme...
Articles & Books
Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 1, January 2017
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) recently held that a former owner and the co-inventor of a patent may challenge the validity of the patent in an inter partes review after assigni...
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently held that a former owner and the co-inventor of a patent may challenge the validity of the patent in an inter partes review after assigning the ...
